https://www.thesupercars.org/roush/2010-roush-427r-mustang/ Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:17 +0000 hourly 1 https://www.thesupercars.org/roush/2010-roush-427r-mustang/#comment-169786 Sat, 26 May 2012 13:00:17 +0000 http://www.thesupercars.org/?p=4744#comment-169786 Advocate72 seems to think the 427 stands for cubic inches. It doesn’t. It’s just a name. This car actually has 281 cubic inches which works out to 1.54 hp per cubic inch. It that rate, if this car really had 427 cubic inches, it would be making 661 hp. This raises an interesting question. Why did Ford call this Mustang a 427?

]]> https://www.thesupercars.org/roush/2010-roush-427r-mustang/#comment-134866 Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:49:16 +0000 http://www.thesupercars.org/?p=4744#comment-134866 Actually, the 427R has a 4.6 v8, which translates to a 281ci engine. Still, the new Roushes equipped with the Coyote 5.0 is alot better than the 4.6, a much flatter torque curve. One day, I hope I inherit my dad’s “10 427R…

]]> https://www.thesupercars.org/roush/2010-roush-427r-mustang/#comment-75486 Thu, 28 Apr 2011 03:23:22 +0000 http://www.thesupercars.org/?p=4744#comment-75486 There is a HUGE problem here or am I the only one that see’s it??? A Supercharged 427 and it only puts out 435 hp WHAT THE HELL IS THAT??? I mean for a 427 and Supercharged on top of that I would expect nothing less than 600hp or better.

]]>